Study on the Sustainability of the bYo Yoga Mat

How sustainable is our bYo yoga mat? This is a question that has played a crucial role for us from the very beginning. That was reason enough for us to have our 100 percent cork yoga mat tested more thoroughly. We were very proud of the results regarding its carbon footprint. But let’s start from the beginning.

We come across the word “sustainability” every day, as it plays an increasingly important role in the media, politics, and advertising. It’s no wonder: environmental awareness is evolving from an individual lifestyle choice into a social movement. It’s only natural that companies label their products as “sustainable”—even if that might not be true at all.

Yoga and Sustainability

As we delved into the topic of yoga mats, it quickly became clear to us just how little sustainability is embedded in the yoga scene. We were actually even more negatively surprised by how often mats are touted as “sustainable” when, in reality, they aren’t. That was reason enough for us to take a closer look. How sustainable is our bYo yoga mat? We wanted to know exactly, so we commissioned a scientific study to determine the carbon footprint of our yoga mat compared to other products.

 
The Study Setting 
In addition to CO₂, there are other greenhouse gases (including methane and nitrous oxide) whose effect on the warming of the Earth’s atmosphere is converted into the equivalent amount of CO₂, so that the warming effect of a mixture of greenhouse gases can be expressed as a single number. 
 
Accounting for CO2 Equivalents
This value is referred to as CO₂e, which we also used as the basis for the study’s findings. All stages of production were taken into account, from employees’ commutes to work, to energy consumption at the workplace, the materials used, and the shipping of finished goods.
 
Comparison with Other Materials
In addition, emissions from yoga mats made of various materials—such as PVC, TPE, latex, and cork—were compared to those of the bYo yoga mat. The country of manufacture was taken into account. When different sources provided emission values of the same type, the value that was demonstrably shown to have a greater negative or lesser positive impact was used, and this was explained accordingly. All values are listed with source citations for reference.
 
Properties of Cork

What makes cork unique is that it is not the wood of the trees that is used, but exclusively the bark.

The bark is harvested for the first time after about 25 years, and then at regular intervals every 8–9 years.1  Various studies estimate that for every metric ton of harvested cork, 70 metric tons of CO₂ are sequestered from the atmosphere.2  Another study, UAB 2011, estimates a significantly lower figure—18 kg of CO₂ sequestered per kg of harvested cork—but this still results in a clearly negative CO₂ balance. 

In general, the results of these studies take sequestration into account. This means that the CO₂ effect of the entire cork oak forest stand is included in the calculations.According toanother study, however, it is questionable whether and to what extent sequestration should be taken into account.

As a result, this study concludes that the figure from the UAB study is overestimated by a factor of 3.6 to 4.5.4 

We agree with this line of reasoning in order to obtain the most meaningful result possible. For example, we must take land use into account—which means that the area occupied by the cork oak forest could also be used for other purposes. Ultimately, however, the fact remains that harvesting cork oak results in up to three times more CO₂ being sequestered than if the cork bark were not harvested. 

It's not just the material that matters

So, first we have the results based solely on the material itself. However, there are many other factors to consider, such as energy consumption during production, transportation distances, packaging, and much more. Our figures take these factors into account, leading to some interesting results. 

The Importance of Origin

The vast majority of global production comes from China and is transported by sea. However, due to the immense cargo capacity of container ships, the relative amount of CO₂ per kilogram of cargo is comparatively low, even though the total CO₂ emissions from a single container ship are enormous.

Transportation Routes  

How do you weigh the high total emissions against the low emissions per kilogram of product? It’s difficult to find the right approach here, but when comparing different modes of transport, we used the one with the supposedly lower emissions per kilogram of freight (this means that we ranked products from Asia as relatively cheaper in the comparison, even though, in our opinion, the lower emissions per kilogram of freight aren’t necessarily an indication that shipping by sea is sustainable).  

The bYo yoga mat is manufactured sustainably and carefully in Portugal. This is ideal because the natural material is processed right where it is harvested. The short transport distances further enhance the final product.

bYo is carbon negative!

With a value of -4.93 kgCO₂, wearecarbon negative. To explain: A product is considered carbon neutral when the amount of emissions released into the atmosphere equals the amount of CO₂ emissions removed from the atmosphere. The net impact is neutral—zero. The term “carbon negative” goes one step further: a product is considered “carbon negative” when the amount of emissions removed from the atmosphere exceeds the amount of emissions released into the atmosphere. The latter applies to our bYo yoga mat. 

This result reaffirms our commitment to developing sports products that are in harmony with the environment. 

 

1 https://kork.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Von_der_Korkeiche_zum_Kork.pdf 

2 https://co2neg.com/power-of-cork

3 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22813756/

4 https://cedelft.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/04/CE_Delft_27925_Natural_cork_bottle_stoppers_Def.pdf

Additional References

https://www.winnipeg.ca/finance/findata/matmgt/documents/2012/682-2012/682-2012_Appendix_H-WSTP_South_End_Plant_Process_Selection_Report/Appendix%207.pdf

International Energy Administration. 2008. "CO₂ Emissions from Fuel Combustion" ISSN 1683-4291.
http://lysander.sourceoecd.org.libproxy-wb.imf.org/vl=1376909/cl=15/nw=1/rpsv/statistic/s26_about.htm?jnlissn=16834291

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2006. "2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories."
http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html